While reading Bleeding Cool this morning I stumbled across this link, rubbed my bleary eyes, and read it two more times to make sure I was really seeing it.
www.bleedingcool.com/2013/09/1…Whut?
It appears that the misguided soul in question defines the human species by their genitalia and reproductive status. Now, last time I checked, the possession or lack thereof of specific organs is not an indicator of one's total capacity. We all know plenty of males who will never have kids. We also know plenty of females who will never have kids. But the production of kids really only qualifies you for two things: 1. Being able to definitively prove you had sex and 2. Being able to call yourself a mommy or daddy. We ALL know PLENTY of people who had kids and yet still can't get a grasp on the whole parenting thing.
There's not a single manual I've ever read that states "You may not do X unless you are the owner of a penis". Hell, with today's technology, I can even pee a name in the snow!
I do not identify as a feminist although I graduated from Mills College; my world view has always been that if I'm interested in doing something, I'm going to go do it and anyone who has problems with my gender will be either summarily ignored or run over. I hold a pilot's license and attend the Oshkosh Fly-In; I can weld, run a lathe and a mill, and all the power tools are mine. I drive a 4x4 truck (and will move to something smaller for financial purposes). I've played coed ice hockey, driven combat robots (you know them as Battlebots), and played paintball against other guys. I surf fish, build stained glass windows, enjoy photography, draw, and even knit. None of these pursuits is hampered or enhanced by my tits or my unused uterus.
I remember holding my goalie gear and watching another women's hockey team playing before my game. Some early-20's male walked up, giggled, and said, "Oh how cute, girl hockey!". Then he watched for a while as the team effortlessly and smoothly avoided collisions and took off with the puck. His face slowly lost its grin and before he left he said, "Those girls could skate circles around us.". Indeed, they could have! If you've ever spent time at a hockey rink you'll notice that the male teams tend to specialize in short, hard pushes and a lot of collisions. The women's teams tend to specialize in paced endurance and finesse skating, dodging around other players rather than going for the hit. It many ways it reminds me of Russian hockey vs US hockey. Two teams, one male, one female, knew each other fairly well and we decided to share our practice ice time together, and WOW, that was a beautiful thing to watch! The guys taught the gals how to hit and take a hit; the gals taught the guys how to pass properly and how to feint and skate around people. Combining the teams resulted in BOTH teams learning new skills and improving overall.
The point here is that while either gender tended towards a playing style neither side was locked into any playing style or even the ability to play at ALL by virtue of their gender. Indeed, the skillset of either gender was *enhanced* by including the opposite gender. And so it is with the vast majority of pursuits...there's very few pursuits denied to anyone by virtue of their gender; most of the time people don't participate because they're not interested. The airplane doesn't care about the gender of the person flying it. The weld doesn't care about the gender of the person flying it. We have reached a point in our evolution where we are so very, very much more than the organs we were born with, and people who make claims that "that gender shouldn't" should be summarily laughed at for having a complete and utter lack of imagination.